A working system for solo litigators and small litigation firms
LexFlow is built around the work litigators lose between email, calendars and case files: court deadlines, time that never reaches a time entry, and matter context scattered across tools.
A small practice does not lose money for lack of one more dashboard.
It loses money when important work lives in different places.
A deadline moved.
A court event changes. LexFlow puts it in the matter and prepares the supported deadline chain for your review.
Work never reached the timesheet.
At the end of the day, LexFlow groups activity already inside the matter into draft time entries. You accept, edit or reject them.
The matter is scattered across tools.
Documents, client messages, court events, meetings, time and AI work stay around the matter instead of across disconnected folders.
Recover the work you already did.
LexFlow looks at activity already recorded inside the matter — document work, meetings, hearings, comments, client communication and AI activity — and groups it into a review queue at the end of the day.
You see what the system found, the matter it belongs to and the proposed description. Then you accept, edit or reject. Nothing becomes billable just because an algorithm guessed.
Matter
Acme Corp — contract dispute
What the system found
- Edited Answer to Complaint.docx
- Meeting with the client
- Replied to the client's message
Observed window
2:10 PM – 3:40 PM
Duration
You confirm
Proposed description
Reviewed the complaint, drafted the answer and discussed the schedule with the client.
Nothing is billed until you accept.
Court activity should come to the matter — not live in a browser tab you remember to check.
Connect a supported source such as CourtListener/RECAP, PACER or the LexFlow court-mail workflow. New court events can land in the matter, and supported rules can prepare deadline dates from the triggering event.
Every calculated date stays reviewable. The legal decision remains yours.
Supported today
- Sources
- CourtListener/RECAP · PACER · LexFlow court mail
- Rule sets
- Federal courts (FRCP/FRAP) · New York (CPLR) · California (CCP) · Texas · Florida · Illinois
Anywhere else the matter stays manual. We do not treat an unsupported jurisdiction as covered.
Full list of sources and rule setsTriggering event
Complaint served
Calculated deadline
Answer to complaint
Mar 24
- Rule
- FRCP 12(a)(1)(A)
- Source
- CourtListener/RECAP
One matter. One working context.
Open a matter and see the client, documents, upcoming deadlines, court events, meetings, messages, time and money that belong to it. Ask AI about that matter instead of re-explaining the file from scratch.
Acme Corp — contract dispute
Active
- ClientAcme Corp
- Next deadlineAnswer to complaint · Mar 24
- Court events1 new since Monday
- Documents6 files, latest version 3
- Messages1 waiting for your reply
- Unbilled timeDay Review has 2 drafts
What LexFlow does not do yet
We would rather tell you now than after you have moved a matter.
- No Outlook or Microsoft 365 calendar and email sync.
- No QuickBooks sync.
- No native mobile apps. LexFlow works in your phone's browser.
- Clients cannot pay invoices online through LexFlow yet.
- No bulk import from a spreadsheet and no one-click export of the whole workspace.
- No SOC 2 or other security certification. The controls we run are listed on the Security page.
Do not move the whole firm on day one.
Bring one real matter first. For early firms, we can help set up the first active matters and map the data you actually need — clients, matters, deadlines, time and documents — before you commit to a wider migration.
Bring one real matter. We will set it up with you.
For early firms, we help set up the first active matters and map the data you need. Start on the free plan, no credit card.
No credit card for Free • Cancel anytime